rotcellphone.blogg.se

1. #REVIEW FLACK AUTOMATIC EMAIL SENDER HOW TO#
2. #REVIEW FLACK AUTOMATIC EMAIL SENDER UPGRADE#
3. #REVIEW FLACK AUTOMATIC EMAIL SENDER WINDOWS#

#REVIEW FLACK AUTOMATIC EMAIL SENDER UPGRADE#

Hi guysI have a 2012 R2 Standard 64 domain controller that i would like to upgrade to the 2022 Standard 64, ive read a lot of articles saying that its possible to upgrade straight but ive also read that there are things to worry about that i should instal.

#REVIEW FLACK AUTOMATIC EMAIL SENDER WINDOWS#

because you cannot tell if this users mailbox is being used by the corespondent user solely for company purposes because there are more users (the supervisor) who uses this mail box also even though it is for a short amount of period or that the supervisor is using it for only supervisory purpose.Īnd so the list can go on. data integrity, may be while using the users mailbox the supervisor could have accidentally deleted some important mails and without a proper backup system you have lost this for good.ģ.when being audited, reliability of information here is being touched. if that users and supervisor do not go well often, the supervisor may do something that could implicate the user position.Ģ. There are many reasons why not to do that:ġ. when it comes to data integrity and safety i would suggest to let the person leaving the office for vacation create a forwarding rule and an "out of office" automatic message reply instead of giving someone else access to the users mailbox. I would not recommend this as this is not ethic. It's not I.T.'s job to be a detective in regards to client specific requirements. That's about all that would need to be thought about but that's something the supervisor should be conveying to you. Things like secure print had to be setup for any employee working on their project, only they could have access to client information and so on. For example when I worked in the healthcare industry we would have specific requirements the client wanted. The only time I could even foresee this being an issue is if its 1) industry specific regulations or 2) client specific terms. can take care of and that should be the extent of your worrying. As others have suggested, mailbox auditing is something you in I.T. However, if their SUPERVISOR wanted to respond to emails, I don't see it has being anything that concerns I.T. but more a department specific thing. Simply setting up temporary forwarding and have the out of office reply on stating email has been forwarded to in my absence is all that should be required. If the manager wants access for that reason it seems they want to be able to respond if necessary? It's not exactly how I would go about it. Most if not all company's have an acceptance use policy or something along those lines that goes on to explain about company property, what you do on company time, and any and all communication is considered to be that of the company. I really think people are over analyzing the situation.

We find this works very well, protects the employee, manager and the organisation from any accusations of impropriety. That way it protects the employee from any wanton and unsanctioned access to their mailbox, and the manager can't just decide on a whim that they're giving themselves access without anyone up the chain of command knowing. That way everyone, including the employee, is aware, and its all in the open and above board. When the manager's manager OKs the access, we grant it then send an Email to them, the manager, and the employee, saying that it has been done. It doesn't matter how high up you are, if its the Pope himself asking for access, still has to be signed off by his manager or we simply don't do it. On the odd occasion when its a sudden / unplanned absence / sick etc, and an employee's manager wants access to their mailbox, we require an Email from the manager's manager, to the Helpdesk mailbox, stating that they've OK'd the request. Most people who know they're going to be off, set an Out of Office message before they go, instructing any people Emailing who to contact instead in their absence. We don't do it by default when someone is off, unless its specifically requested.